en · de · es · fr · pt
sr9009-notes.peptides6088.com › Guide › Sr9009 Identity And Mechanism — Quick Reference

Sr9009 Identity And Mechanism — Quick Reference

By Editorial Desk · published 2025-10-22 · last reviewed 2025-11-05 · Guide

freeze-thaw cycle is one of those subjects where the details matter more than the headlines. This page pulls together the background, the mechanisms, and the practical points readers ask about most.

Updated 2025-11-05. Numbers and descriptions here follow the published literature rather than marketing material.

SR9009 Identity and Mechanism

SR9009 is frequently discussed alongside other REV-ERB ligands, including synthetic agonists and natural heme-related molecules. Its selectivity for REV-ERB over related nuclear receptors has been measured in binding and reporter assays, though off-target activity at higher concentrations is possible. The compound is prohibited in sport by the World Anti-Doping Agency, and it is not approved for any medical use in major jurisdictions. Products sold online may be labeled as research chemicals, and their identity and purity are not guaranteed by regulatory review.

SR9009 is a synthetic small molecule that acts on the nuclear receptors REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ. These receptors are part of the circadian clock machinery and normally repress transcription of certain target genes. In laboratory research, SR9009 is used as a chemical tool to study how REV-ERB activity influences metabolism, inflammation, and daily biological rhythms. The compound is not an approved medicine, and its effects in humans remain largely uncharacterized. It is often described as an investigational agent rather than a therapeutic product.

Analytical Detection and Storage

Storage recommendations for SR9009 reference material typically specify a freezer at -20 °C or lower, with protection from moisture and light. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles can degrade small molecules and introduce variability. Stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide are often aliquoted to avoid repeated handling. Stability studies may examine degradation under heat, humidity, and light exposure. The compound's thiophene and nitro groups can participate in reactions that alter analytical signals over time, so such changes affect quantitative results.

Quality control for research materials includes identity confirmation by nuclear magnetic resonance and purity assessment by high-performance liquid chromatography. Mass spectrometry provides molecular weight confirmation and can detect related impurities. Purchasers should request a certificate of analysis that lists lot-specific data. Online products advertised for human use often lack such documentation. Distinguishing legitimate research material from mislabeled or contaminated samples is a recurring challenge in independent testing, and independent laboratories may use orthogonal methods to verify identity.

Sr9009 at a glance

PropertyValueNotes
Common nameSR9009Also marketed informally as Stenabolic
Chemical classSynthetic REV-ERB agonistBinds REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ
Molecular formulaC24H30ClN3O4SApproximate molecular weight 492 g/mol
CAS Registry Number1379686-30-2Identifier for the parent compound
Regulatory statusNot approved for human useProhibited in sport by WADA

Analytical Detection and Regulatory Status

Analytical methods for SR9009 typically rely on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. The technique can separate the parent compound from related substances and detect low concentrations in biological matrices. Urine and blood are common samples in anti-doping testing, while in vitro studies may use cell culture media. Rapid metabolism and low expected concentrations make method validation important for reliable identification. Exact metabolite patterns can vary by species and are not fully mapped.

Regulatory treatment of SR9009 reflects its investigational status. The compound has no approved human therapeutic indication, and sports authorities prohibit its use. It appears on anti-doping lists as a non-approved substance or metabolic modulator, depending on the list version. Products sold online as research chemicals are not quality-controlled medicines, so their identity and purity can differ from the label. Such products may also contain unlisted compounds, which complicates both testing and safety assessment.

Related pages on this site

SR9009 Background and Receptor Mechanism

SR9009 binds REV-ERB receptors and alters their repressive activity on target genes. This action can change transcription of genes involved in lipid handling, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial function. In rodent studies, treated animals have shown changes in muscle oxidative capacity and exercise performance, though effects vary by dose, duration, and model. The precise molecular steps connecting receptor binding to whole-body outcomes are still an active area of investigation. Findings in animals do not automatically translate to humans.

Because REV-ERB receptors are core clock components, SR9009 has been examined for effects on daily rhythms as well as metabolism. Research has explored whether the compound can shift or reinforce circadian gene expression in tissues such as liver and muscle. Some studies report improved metabolic markers in obese or diabetic mice, while others show context-dependent responses. Questions remain about which effects are direct, which are secondary to timing, and how they might differ across species.

SR9009 is a synthetic small molecule studied as an agonist of REV-ERB nuclear receptors. REV-ERB alpha and REV-ERB beta help regulate circadian rhythms and metabolic gene expression. In laboratory research, SR9009 has been used to probe how these receptors affect skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. The compound was identified in academic drug-discovery work and is often described in scientific literature by its chemical name and research code. It is not an approved medicine, and human clinical data remain limited or absent.

SR9009 Background and Mechanism

Pharmacokinetic data for SR9009 are limited in published literature. Some reports indicate low oral bioavailability and rapid clearance in animals, which complicates interpretation of exposure and effect. Researchers often use injected routes in preclinical work to achieve measurable systemic levels. Analytical studies rely on mass spectrometry to detect the parent compound and its metabolites. Questions about tissue distribution, active metabolites, and long-term consequences remain open. Species differences in metabolism can affect observed half-life and target engagement.

SR9009 is a synthetic small molecule studied as an agonist of the nuclear receptors REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ. These receptors help regulate circadian rhythms and metabolic gene expression. In laboratory experiments, SR9009 binds these receptors and alters transcription of genes involved in lipid handling, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial function. It is not a naturally occurring compound and has no approved therapeutic use. Research interest stems from its ability to modify energy metabolism in cells and animal models.

In rodent studies, SR9009 has been reported to increase mitochondrial content in skeletal muscle and improve exercise endurance under some conditions. These findings led to popular descriptions such as an exercise mimetic, although that term oversimplifies the biology. Effects vary by dose, timing, tissue, and model. The compound's influence on circadian pathways means that time of administration can matter in experiments. Whether similar metabolic changes occur in humans remains largely unexplored in controlled published trials.

Mechanism and Preclinical Findings

Preclinical reports have linked SR9009 to improved endurance and altered energy expenditure in rodents. Such findings have prompted interest in whether REV-ERB activation can influence skeletal muscle metabolism. However, the reported effects depend on dose, route, and experimental model, and replication across laboratories is limited. Human trials have not established comparable outcomes, so claims about exercise performance remain speculative. The absence of controlled human data is a central limitation in interpreting these observations.

The mechanism of action involves binding to REV-ERB receptors and recruiting corepressor complexes, which represses target gene transcription. This contrasts with many nuclear receptor agonists that activate transcription. Downstream effects may include changes in autophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis, and lipid handling, but the precise pathways remain an active area of study. Whether these molecular events translate into meaningful physiological effects in humans is unresolved. Most evidence comes from cultured cells and rodent models rather than human participants.

Further detail

In 1900, the German colonial administration of Nauru granted phosphate rights to British businessman John T. Arundel's Pacific Islands Company (PIC). The PIC was replaced by the Pacific Phosphate Company (PPC) in 1902, with German interests holding around one-third of the company's share capital. Production commenced in 1906, largely relying on indentured labour, with Australia and New Zealand as the primary markets. In 1914, following the outbreak of the First World War, the Australian Naval and Military Expeditionary Force occupied Nauru, with an agreement reached whereby the Australian military would assume administrative control of the island and the PPC would continue phosphate operations. Following the end of the war, Nauru was made a League of Nations mandate under the joint trusteeship of Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, with Australia retaining administration of the island. In 1919, the three trustees signed the Nauru Island Agreement, which entitled them to the phosphate of Nauru through the British Phosphate Commissioners. They bought back all the assets of the PPC for more than 3.5 million pounds on 1 July 1920, and started to manage it directly on 1 January 1921, after a six-month transition period of PPC management. Most of PPC's former employees were retained by the BPC.

Protamine sulfate replaced hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene), another cationic agent that was the original heparin reversal agent in the early days of heart surgery, until studies in the 1960s suggested that hexadimethrine bromide might cause kidney failure when used in doses in excess of its therapeutic range.

== Career and research == In March 1947, de Duve joined the faculty of the medical school of the Catholic University of Leuven teaching physiological chemistry. In 1951 he became full professor. In 1960, Detlev Bronk, the then president of the Rockfeller Institute (what is now Rockefeller University) of New York City, met him at Brussels and offered him professorship and a laboratory. The rector of Leuven, afraid of entirely losing de Duve, made a compromise over dinner that de Duve would still be under part-time appointment with a relief from teaching and conducting examinations. The rector and Bronk made an agreement which would initially last for five years. The official implementation was in 1962, and de Duve simultaneously headed the research laboratories at Leuven and at Rockefeller University, dividing his time between New York and Leuven. In 1969, the Catholic University of Leuven was contentiously split into two separate universities along linguistic lines. De Duve chose to join the French-speaking side, Université catholique de Louvain. He took emeritus status at the University of Louvain in 1985 and at Rockefeller in 1988, though he continued to conduct research. Among other subjects, he studied the distribution of enzymes in rat liver cells using rate-zonal centrifugation. His work on cell fractionation provided an insight into the function of cell structures. He specialized in subcellular biochemistry and cell biology and discovered new cell organelles.

=== EC 1.13.11 With incorporation of two atoms of oxygen === EC 1.13.11.1: catechol 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.2: catechol 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.3: protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.4: gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.5: homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.6: 3-hydroxyanthranilate 3,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.7: deleted EC 1.13.11.8: protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.9: 2,5-dihydroxypyridine 5,6-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.10: 7,8-dihydroxykynurenate 8,8a-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.11: tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.12: linoleate 13S-lipoxygenas EC 1.13.11.13: The activity is the sum of several enzymatic and spontaneous reactions EC 1.13.11.14: 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate 3,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.15: 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetate 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.16: 3-carboxyethylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.17: indole 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.18: persulfide dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.19: cysteamine dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.20: cysteine dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.21: Now EC 1.14.99.36, β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase EC 1.13.11.22: caffeate 3,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.23: 2,3-dihydroxyindole 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.24: quercetin 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.25: 3,4-dihydroxy-9,10-secoandrosta-1,3,5(10)-triene-9,17-dione 4,5-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.26: peptide-tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.27: 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.28: 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.29: stizolobate synthase EC 1.13.11.30: stizolobinate synthase EC 1.13.11.31: arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.32: Now EC 1.13.12.16, nitronate monooxygenase EC 1.13.11.33: arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.34: arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.35: pyrogallol 1,2-oxygenase EC 1.13.11.36: chloridazon-catechol dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.37: hydroxyquinol 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.38: 1-hydroxy-2-naphthoate 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.39: biphenyl-2,3-diol 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.40: arachidonate 8-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.41: 2,4′-dihydroxyacetophenone dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.42: identical to EC 1.13.11.11, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.43: lignostilbene αβ-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.44: Activity is covered by EC 1.13.11.60, linoleate 8R-lipoxygenase and EC 5.4.4.6, 9,12-octadecadienoate 8-hydroperoxide 8S-isomerase EC 1.13.11.45: linoleate 11-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.46: 4-hydroxymandelate synthase EC 1.13.11.47: 3-hydroxy-4-oxoquinoline 2,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.48: 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-quinolin-4-one 2,4-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.49: chlorite O2-lyase EC 1.13.11.50: acetylacetone-cleaving enzyme EC 1.13.11.51: 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.52: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.53: acireductone dioxygenase (Ni2+-requiring) EC 1.13.11.54: acireductone dioxygenase [iron(II)-requiring] EC 1.13.11.55: sulfur oxygenase/reductase EC 1.13.11.56: 1,2-dihydroxynaphthalene dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.57: gallate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.58: linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.59: torulene dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.60: inoleate 8R-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.61: linolenate 9R-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.62: linoleate 10R-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.63: β-carotene 15,15′-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.64: 5-nitrosalicylate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.65: carotenoid isomerooxygenase EC 1.13.11.66: hydroquinone 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.67: 8′-apo-β-carotenoid 14′,13′-cleaving dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.68: 9-cis-β-carotene 9′,10′-cleaving dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.69: carlactone synthase EC 1.13.11.70: all-trans-10′-apo-β-carotenal 13,14-cleaving dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.71: carotenoid-9′,10′-cleaving dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.72: 2-hydroxyethylphosphonate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.73: methylphosphonate synthase EC 1.13.11.74: 2-aminophenol 1,6-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.75: all-trans-8′-apo-β-carotenal 15,15′-oxygenase EC 1.13.11.76: 2-amino-5-chlorophenol 1,6-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.77: oleate 10S-lipoxygenase EC 1.13.11.78: 2-amino-1-hydroxyethylphosphonate dioxygenase (glycine-forming) EC 1.13.11.79: aerobic 5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole synthase EC 1.13.11.80: (3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)acetyl-CoA 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.81: 7,8-dihydroneopterin oxygenase EC 1.13.11.82: 8′-apo-carotenoid 13,14-cleaving dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.83: 4-hydroxy-3-prenylphenylpyruvate oxygenase EC 1.13.11.84: crocetin dialdehyde synthase EC 1.13.11.85: exo-cleaving rubber dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.86: 5-aminosalicylate 1,2-dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.87: endo-cleaving rubber dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.88: isoeugenol monooxygenase EC 1.13.11.89: (hydroxymethyl)phosphonate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.90: [1-hydroxy-2-(trimethylamino)ethyl]phosphonate dioxygenase (glycine-betaine-forming) EC 1.13.11.91: 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenase EC 1.13.11.92: fatty acid α-dioxygenase

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Background from the literature

Corticotrophin derived from pituitary glands from pigs, in a gel formulation as well as in a zinc hydrochloride formulation, each first approved in the US in 1955 and subsequently discontinued. In September 2015 ANI Pharmaceuticals and Merck & Co. agreed that ANI would purchase NDA 009854 and NDA 008975 and related trademarks and other assets related to these two versions of corticotrophin from Merck for $75M and ongoing royalties; the transaction closed in January 2016. As of November 2016 ANI was preparing its supplemental NDA to get approval to re-introduce this formulation; in 2015 ANI estimated that the US market for these products was about $1 billion per year, based on sales of Acthar gel. Corticotrophin, first approved in 1952 and subsequently discontinued; as of January 2017 this NDA was under control of Parkedale, a subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals which is in turn a subsidiary of Pfizer. Corticotrophin branded as "Acthar", was first approved in 1950 and was subsequently discontinued; as of January 2017 this NDA was under control of Sanofi. A corticotrophin was approved in 1957 under NDA 010831, was subsequently discontinued, and as of January 2017 was under control of Organics/Lagrange, a subsidiary of Abbvie via Abbott's acquisition of Solvay's drug business. A generic version under this NDA was approved under ANDA 088772 and was subsequently discontinued, and as of January 2017 was under the control of Actavis. A corticotrophin called H.P. Acthar Gel was approved in 1952 and as of January 2017 was under the control of Mallinckrodt.

== As a drug target == The oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex) is responsible for converting AKG into succinyl-CoA in the citric acid cycle. It is one of the rate-limiting enzymes in the cycle. In breast cancer with lung metasatsis models, inhibiting this enzyme (causing an accumulation of AKG) reduces cancer cell growth; a similar effect is observed with AKG supplementation in mice with B-cell lymphoma. On the other hand, a dysfunction of this enzyme (again causing AKG accumulation) leads to increased lipid peroxidation in CHCHD2-linked Parkinson's disease models and appears to be partly responsible for elevated phosphorylated α-synuclein levels, as improving the function of this complex causes both AKG and phosphorylated α-synuclei to decrease.

The need to address the issue of British trade deficit because of the trade in tea resulted in the Opium Wars. The Qing Kangxi Emperor had banned foreign products from being sold in China, decreeing in 1685 that all goods bought from China must be paid for in silver coin or bullion. Traders from other nations then sought to find another product, in this case opium, to sell to China to earn back the silver they were required to pay for tea and other commodities. The subsequent attempts by the Chinese Government to curtail the trade in opium led to war.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Further detail

Like Canada hemlock, this tree suffers severely from the hemlock woolly adelgid. Several species of pines characteristic of the Appalachians are eastern white pine (Pinus strobus ), Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), pitch pine (Pinus rigida ), Table Mountain pine (Pinus pungens) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata). Red pine (Pinus resinosa) is a boreal species that forms a few high elevation outliers as far south as West Virginia. All of these species except white pine tend to occupy sandy, rocky, poor soil sites, which are mostly acidic in character. White pine, a large species valued for its timber, tends to do best in rich, moist soil, either acidic or alkaline in character. Pitch pine is also at home in acidic, boggy soil, and Table Mountain pine may occasionally be found in this habitat as well. Shortleaf pine is generally found in warmer habitats and at lower elevations than the other species. All the species listed do best in open or lightly shaded habitats, although white pine also thrives in shady coves, valleys, and on floodplains. The Appalachians are characterized by a wealth of large, beautiful deciduous broadleaf (hardwood) trees. Their occurrences are best summarized and described in E. Lucy Braun's 1950 classic, Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America (Macmillan, New York).

== Moisture content == Water activity is related to water content in a non-linear relationship known as a moisture sorption isotherm curve. These isotherms are substance- and temperature-specific. Isotherms can be used to help predict product stability over time in different storage conditions.

=== DES litigation === Lilly was one of numerous manufacturers of diethylstilbestrol (DES), a synthetic estrogen that was prescribed to pregnant women to prevent pregnancy complications such as miscarriage. In 1971, researchers linked prenatal DES exposure to clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. The Food and Drug Administration responded by advising physicians not to prescribe DES to pregnant women. More than 300 companies manufactured DES, which later complicated litigation because plaintiffs often could not identify which manufacturer had supplied the drug taken by their mothers. In Bichler v. Eli Lilly and Company, Joyce Bichler sued Lilly after developing cervical and vaginal cancer at age 17 following prenatal exposure to DES. In 1982, the New York Court of Appeals upheld a $500,000 jury award to Bichler even though it had not been established that Lilly manufactured the particular DES taken by her mother. In the 1989 case Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly and Company, the New York Court of Appeals adopted a form of market share liability for DES cases that allowed liability to be apportioned among manufacturers according to their share of the national DES market when the specific producer could not be identified. DES litigation continued for decades. In 2013, Lilly reached an undisclosed settlement during a federal trial brought by four sisters who alleged that their breast cancers resulted from DES their mother had taken during pregnancy. Lilly disputed that DES caused their cancers and disputed whether their mother had taken DES manufactured by Lilly.

== Trials == Howard Florey's team at Oxford showed that Penicillium extract killed many kinds of bacteria. Gardner and Orr-Ewing tested it against gonococcus (against which it was most effective), meningococcus, streptococcus, staphylococcus, Bacillus anthracis, actinomyces and tetanus bacterium (Clostridium tetani) and the bacteria that cause gangrene. They observed bacteria attempting to grow in the presence of penicillin, and noted that penicillin was neither an enzyme that broke the bacteria down, nor an antiseptic that killed them; rather, it was a chemical that interfered with the process of cell division. Jennings observed that it had no effect on white blood cells, and would therefore reinforce rather than hinder the body's natural defences against bacteria. She also found that unlike sulphonamides, the first and only effective broad-spectrum antibiotic available at the time, it was not destroyed by pus. Medawar found that it did not affect the growth of tissue cells.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Frequently asked questions

What is SR9009?

SR9009 is a synthetic research compound that binds and modulates the nuclear receptors REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ. It is used in laboratory studies of circadian biology and metabolism, not as an approved medicine. It is also known by the informal name Stenabolic.

Is SR9009 approved for human use?

No. SR9009 has not been approved as a therapeutic drug in the United States, European Union, or other major markets. Human safety and efficacy data are very limited. Its presence in consumer products does not imply regulatory approval.

Why is SR9009 banned in sport?

The World Anti-Doping Agency lists SR9009 as a prohibited substance because it can alter gene expression and metabolic pathways relevant to performance. The ban applies at all times, not only during competition. Detection relies on laboratory methods such as mass spectrometry.

How is SR9009 measured?

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry is a common approach. It can detect the parent compound and its metabolites in biological matrices.

Network